Journal: PLoS Biology
Article Title: Cilia-based peptidergic signaling
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000566
Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Agarose block assay. CC124 minus gametes were uniformly spread on the surface of a Petri dish containing 1% agar in M-N medium. Agarose blocks containing 10 μM GATI-amide, 10 μM GATI-OH, M-N medium, or M-N medium containing 0.1% DMSO were placed onto the Petri dish; after 30 minutes in the dark, minus gametes had accumulated around the agarose block containing GATI-amide (red arrow). Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. B. Microfluidic chemotaxis assay. Microfluidic channel slides were used for chemoattractant gradient formation. An image of a gradient of red food dye is shown. For each treatment, the number of cells in regions 0, I, and 2 were counted over time. C. Chemotaxis assay of minus gametes in microchannel slide . The chemotaxis index (CI) was measured over a period of 4 hours in response to 10 μM GATI-amide, GATI-OH, GATI-Gly, M-N medium, and vehicle control. The CI in the presence of GATI-amide was significantly higher at 3 hours (** P < 0.01) and 4 hours (* P < 0.05) compared to 0.1% DMSO. D. Dose dependence of the response of minus gametes to GATI-amide . A 4-hour incubation period was used; 0.2% DMSO was used as the vehicle control to accommodate the use of 20 μM peptide. The CI of 5 μM GATI-amide was significantly higher than the control at 3 hours (** P < 0.01); for 10 μM GATI-amide, the CI was significantly higher at 3 hours (** P < 0.01) and 4 hours (* P < 0.05), while for 20 μM GATI-amide it was significantly higher at 2 hours (* P < 0.05), 3 hours (*** P < 0.01), and 4 hours (* P < 0.05). The only CI to ever exceed 1.00 was for GATI-amide. E. Chemotactic response . The response of minus and plus gametes to 10 μM GATI-amide and 0.1% DMSO. The number of cells for each treatment was counted along the entire channel length, and the ratio of the number of cells in each slice/number of cells in slice 0 (n slice X /n slice 0 ) was plotted for the 4-hour time point. The response of gametic CC124 cells to GATI-amide was significantly (** P < 0.001) different from gametic CC125 cells. Data are the average of three independent experiments ± SEM. F. Trajectory plots . Plots are shown for minus and plus gametes. Data are representative of three independent experiments; all plots shown are from one experiment. G. Population response. The center of mass was calculated for each population from trajectory plots like those shown in F . Results are the average of three independent experiments ± SEM. H. Motile behavior. The swimming velocities of minus and plus gametes were not altered by the presence of the amidated peptide. Results are the average of three independent experiments ± SEM. One-way and two-way ANOVAs were used as appropriate. The underlying numeric data for this figure can be found in . GATI-amide, VLYPNDPAAYAAYAPGTGGGATI-amide; M-N medium, gametic medium.
Article Snippet: Microfluidic channel slides (μ slide I 0.2 Luer; ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany) were used for gradient formation.
Techniques: Blocking Assay, Chemotaxis Assay, Control, Incubation